Importance of Fifty State Strategy Becomes Conventional Wisdom
Posted by on March 14, 2006 at 09:46 AM
Governor Dean knew it was a good idea. The grassroots and non-traditional media infrastructure of the party bought in immediately. State Party Chairs were singing its praises and discussing the impact of the program during the one year anniversary celebration of Governor Dean's chairmanship. And despite the always-anonymous detractors, the importance of the fifty state strategy is quickly becoming conventional wisdom in the traditional media. Three successive articles over the course of the past seven days highlight the usefulness of the undertaking.
First was captain conventional wisdom himself, Charlie Cook:
The primary responsibility of the DNC is not to win House, Senate, gubernatorial, or state legislative races, but to build and sustain a national party and to oversee the presidential conventions and nomination process. The same is true of the Republican National Committee. No other entities within the two major parties are charged with those missions.
In January, while giving a speech at Mississippi State University, I happened to meet a DNC staffer, a former executive director of the Oklahoma Democratic Party, who was assigned full-time to party-building in Mississippi. In the 33 years that I have been involved in politics, I have never heard of the national Democratic Party assigning a full-time staff member to organizational efforts in Mississippi.
Then the Boston Globe:
'When we first met Howard Dean, we thought he'd be a nut," said Nick Casey, West Virginia's party chairman. ''But that's not the guy who's been delivering the goods, and he has been delivering to us."
Casey's state party has doubled its number of precinct chairmen and is halfway to its goal of having one in each of West Virginia's more than 1,900 voting precincts. The three new staff members sent by the DNC have given the state party more than twice its previous manpower.
Party chairmen across the nation tell similar stories. In Ohio, the five people being paid by the DNC have helped set up ''Victory Squads" -- teams of about 10 Democrats who are eager to knock on doors or set up lawn signs -- in 65 rural counties where Democratic presidential candidate John F. Kerry fared poorly in 2004.
Mississippi's Democratic Party has established an infrastructure in 10 counties where the organization had atrophied. The DNC has sent resources to hire five full-time workers -- up from just a single part-timer previously -- helping Democrats secure victories in five special legislative elections over the past year, party chairman Wayne Dowdy said.
State parties are generally used to this kind of attention from the DNC only in the six months or so before a presidential election, and then only if they're among the small group of states that are considered in play.
Locally, the Albuquerque Journal provides the third wheel of the trifecta (subs. only):
It doesn't take a political expert to figure out why the DNC's 2004 New Mexico campaign fell short: Although Democrats have long outnumbered Republicans, President Bush bested Kerry by about 6,000 votes.
The DNC early last year elected former presidential hopeful Howard Dean as the national party chairman, and Farrauto said the chairs of state Democratic Parties nationwide asked him to place more focus— and spend more national party dollars— on stat e parties in the years between presidential elections.
"It's a really critical investment," said state Democratic Party chairman John Wertheim. "There was a consensus among the state chairs that the national party needed to get involved in mid-term elections, in municipal elections, in elections at all levels— because that would lay the groundwork for winning the presidential race the next time around," Wertheim said.
There are now nine staffers in the state party's Albuquerque headquarters, including the four field directors, Farrauto said. The party has a Web site— something it didn't have at this time in 2004. And Farrauto said the office phones are ringing far more than they once did.
Of course, the flip-side to the fifty state strategy is the Democracy Bonds Community. On that end, it's you getting the job done. In order to put organizers on the ground in every state and build a permanent party infrastructure where there hasn't been one for decades, it takes sound financial planning and a sustained commitment of resources. We can't afford to have a boom-and-bust operation that pops up every two or four years in a few key states. We have to build a permanent presence everywhere, and Democracy Bonds make that possible.
What's more, by funding this unprecedented organizing strategy with small monthly donations from ordinary Americans, the Democracy Bonds community provides a sharp contrast to the insidious Republican culture of corruption that has recently begun to unravel. We saw in court filings this week how Republican leaders raise money: in exchange for putting statements in the Congressional Record, or granting federal contracts, or expensive golf trips to Scotland.
This concept scares the GOP, and they quick to paint the grassroots of the Democratic Party willing to part with small dollar contributions every month in order to fund a Democratic Party fighting in each and every one of the fifty states as "fringe," "extremist," or out-of-touch with mainstream American values. Our graphic designer, Jessica, put together a beautiful montage of Democracy Bond holders complete with photos and testimonials. These are the people the GOP thinks are the "far left wing." Clicking on the photo takes you where you need to go.

For more on the people making the fifty-state strategy not just a possibility, but a national success story, click here.
Comments - 39 »
Comments - 39 «
The Fifty-state Strategy is real nice, Clark, but the party has to give people something of substance in which to believe.
Bush, Cheney, and the Rubber Stamp Congress have given Americans reasons enough to be in the streets in the multitudes, yet our party is loathe to lay out courageous, visionary, and clear exception to the myriad Constitutional offenses committed since Bush stole the Presidency.
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism".
- Thomas Jefferson
Hey, Howard and Company: It's more than okay to point out Bush's crimes; it's your duty.
Posted by ChuckWisconsin on March 14, 2006 at 12:06 PM
We need to get more volenteers with a good truck to cover their district driving a big sign on their truck around their area.
What about a sign telling the people that Republicans are selling influnce and access with $50,000. or more you can bribe the Republicans to write a Bill or access to their Leaders?
Posted by freeforall on March 14, 2006 at 01:33 PM
The 50 State Strategy is something that I believe is far overdue. In a representative form of government there are times we need our leadership (that is why they are called leadership) to take a stand that rallies the troops. Then there are times that the troops (citizens in this case) must take a stand to make sure the leadership knows they have the backing to stand up and fight.
Anyone that says the DNC should concentrate its resources only on the 'battleground' states are missing the big picture. For the Congressional and Senate races, we have organizations specifically for that purpose. And this year we should especially look to help them in this effort. It is critical that we regain control of the congress to stop the damage that is being done. Sure the DNC should help, but not at the expense of the rest of the country.
I live in the state of Georgia and for most of my life this was firmly in the Democratic column. Our first republican governor since reconstruction was elected only 4 years ago and stands a good chance of not being re-elected. The county I am in has historically been Democratic, though many more republicans have recently moved in. The last presidential election it went (unbelievably) 74% for Dubya. Yet all our local elected officials are Democrats.
Look at the voter numbers in the last presidential election. They are not that far apart. These so called red states are purple and could turn blue if people would stand up and educate the citizens of our polices and why we hold them. We have lost a lot of working Americans because the national Democrats were not here to effectively counter the attacks of the republicans. Not responding to them has made a lot of good people to mistakenly believe them.
Many people will say they are democrats, but disagree with the national party. That is mainly from misconceptions that have been promoted by the far right. I talk to them about what they believe and want for our country, and I find it is not what the republicans are providing. I may not agree with everything every Democrat promotes, but I always find they are much closer to my values than the republicans are.
Every state can be a battleground state if we stand up for ourselves. And no issue, not one, should be avoided. We must talk from our core beliefs and show that our policies are aimed at protecting all citizens and providing a fair and just opportunity for everyone.
Posted by GAmtn on March 14, 2006 at 01:37 PM
Every Democrat needs to stand firmly in favor of Russ Feingold's Censure Resolution. Where do each of them stand? Now is not thet time for equivocating. The rumor is that Democrats will be painted with being "pro-terrorist". This is absolute nonsense. The President must be accountable under the law. Anything less is dictatorship.
Posted by solamia on March 14, 2006 at 01:55 PM
IN WHAT DIRECTION ARE THE DEMOCRATS GOING - AND WHEN WILL THEY LET THE COUNTRY KNOW ABOUT IT?
Via Glenn Greenwald: Like anyone else, the White House has every right to engage in aggressive advocacy when defending itself as part of the NSA scandal or any other issue, and it is not the role of the media to take sides in political debates. But when the White House simply lies, it is the responsibility -- the core purpose -- of journalists to point that out.
Here, according to an article from Reuters, is what Scott McClellan said today in response to Sen. Feingold's censure resolution:
"I think it does raise the question, how do you fight and win the war on terrorism?" McClellan said. "And if Democrats want to argue that we shouldn't be listening to al Qaeda communications, it's their right and we welcome the debate. We are a nation at war."
This is not advocacy. This is just lying. No Democrats are advocating that we not listen to Al Qaeda communications, and Scott McClellan knows that. And no journalist ought to pass along this falsehood without pointing out that it is factually false.
The debate is not and has never been over whether we should eavesdrop on Al Qaeda. Everyone wants eavesdropping on Al Qaeda. The issue is whether the Bush Administration should eavesdrop in accordance with the law (with judicial oversight and approval), or in violation of the law (in secret and with no oversight, something that has been a criminal offense in this country since 1978). That is NSA Scandal 101, something that has been clearly established and beyond dispute from for months.
It is a potent reflection of how little the White House can say in response to the accusation that the President broke the law that they can respond only by: (a) flagrantly and dishonestly distorting the argument against it (by pretending that this is about whether we should eavesdrop on Al Qaeda), or (b) accusing those who protest the President's law-breaking of committing treason.
The reason that we invaded Iraq with an astounding (and truly embarrassing) 70% of the country believing (falsely) that Saddam personally participated in the planning of the 9/11 attacks is because the media failed in its responsibility to correct factually false Government statements. They just blithely passed them along without comment, as though their function is to give the government a megaphone for its propaganda rather than serve as an adversarial watchdog which cynically scrutinizes the government's claims.
It is completely unacceptable, and a total abdication of their responsibility, for the media to pass along the White House's factually false claim that Democrats oppose eavesdropping on Al Qaeda. The media does not need to, and should not, take sides in the NSA debate, but it ought to inform American citizens about what the arguments actually are and what the debate is about. If it doesn't do that, what does it do?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Note: It is also unacceptable that Democratic leaders don’t insist on equal media time and repeat the arguments in one, unified, clearly understandable voice. Day after day after day. That is what the Democratic base wants of its leadership, and that’s what we should be able to expect.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Also read an excellent post by Digby: ... It's not impossible for an opposition party to function in that environment; it means that their only choice is accept that they are irrelevant to actual governance. That's the simple reality in this quasi-parliamentary system the Republicans have rigged up. What that means is that you have to take every opportunity to make your argument clearly and concisely over and over again. You use whatever institutional levers you have at your disposal to put the other side off balance, expose their real agenda and get them on the record doing unpopular things. Everything is about setting up sharp distinctions and preparing the ground for the next election. [continued at link]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are a lot of posts here about buying Democracy Bonds, or giving money to the DNC. But why are we being asked to buy more silence and inaction? This blog should be a starting point for action taking place daily, from the leadership on down, not just a one-post-a-day PR stunt asking for money from people who happen to stumble by.
You could be posting information on which Democratic leader or spokespeople will be on what major news network today. Democrats don't have their own cable news network like Fox News. Shouldn't they start sticking together?
You could be responding to comments occasionally, OR better still, members of the DNC could post or respond on occasion. You could be gathering statements by Democrats throughout the day that are reported in print or on camera.
This blog could be the hub for organizing a full Democratic response and a unified message for once - unless, of course, there actually wouldn't be much to post from anyone but Conyers, Murtha, and Feingold.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by CSColorado on March 14, 2006 at 03:02 PM
Roger that CSColorado!
Little Scotty Mac is the Orwellian mouthpiece, nothing more. He will drop whatever names of the day Rove will require of him to drop. Today it was Al Qaeda; tomorrow it might be Al Gore.
For a President who went to war in violation of the Constitution (only Congress can declare war) and then violated it repeatedly thereafter, Li'l Mac sure pontificates sanctimony all over the damn place.
CS, your ideas are solid and timely. I agree that this site could be genuinely effective beyond the obligatory posts we get in between doing lunch. We get precious little for our devotion and dollars.
We are not yet out of the Democratic Age of Political Cowardice, but Feingold took a bold step in the right direction, contrary to Pelosi's capitulation to the Republicans and betrayal of Rep. Slaughter. She is the paragon of Democratic spinelessness.
If the Cult of Hillary and the others who are keeping their powder dry - even as Bush sinks lower and lower - think that we foot soldiers out in the Hinterlands will rush to support them come November of 2006 or 2008, they are dead wrong.
Someday soon, an incumbent Dem, perhaps Joe Nomentum Zell Lieberman, will issue a call to all Dems for help, and no one will give a rip and with damn good reason.
If Hillary spends her way to the nomination and equivocates all the while as well, this veteran, Democrat, and patriot will work my ass off to see she is defeated simply for having stood on the sidelines now.
Give me action or give me someone else!
Posted by ChuckWisconsin on March 14, 2006 at 03:34 PM
CSColorado -
Keep count, would you, of the number of DLC Democrats who come out in support of Feingold's act of political courage and civic responsibility? You can use the other hand to control the remote while you conduct the futile search.
Thanks.
Posted by BaronScarpia on March 14, 2006 at 03:45 PM
As someone who's been rabidly against Nadarites and others who have thwarted Democrats' chances at victory, I have to agree with the comments today by CSColorado. It's time to mobilize against the theft of the Constitution by the Republicans. Democrats have to act. Feingold is a leader, not a maverick! Let's stand behind him. I will stand behind him as a soldier for the Constitution. Who else will come with us? We, Democrats, need to stand unified and strong about issues where there should be no dissent!
Good people can disagree about some policies of government but no Democrat (and that really should read no American citizen) should allow the Constitution to be trampled as it has been in the past five years. There is no room for disunity on whether the president can violate the law to trample Constitutional rights. It is simply wrong.
Posted by solamia on March 14, 2006 at 03:58 PM
Posted by BaronScarpia on March 14, 2006 at 04:31 PM
"There are a lot of posts here about buying Democracy Bonds, or giving money to the DNC. But why are we being asked to buy more silence and inaction?"
Yes! If the DNC wants my money they damn well better get their act together. So far every time someone speaks out about the illegal actions of the administration they are left in the cold by THEIR OWN PARTY. Dammit this is frustrating.
As it stands, I'd much rather donate to Mr. Murtha or Mr. Feingold to help THEM get elected and leave the rest of the DNC to rot...
Posted by UncommonSense on March 14, 2006 at 04:37 PM
Tim, on a sidenote, tell me -Why are so many Democratic State Party's websites so poorly done and not brought up to date? Take the Virginia Democratic Party's website. Its very rudimentary, and content wise is very lacking.
The best state party site that I've come across has got to be that of the Missouri Democrats. Very professional - content, feautures, directions, easy of use, are all excellent.
We are in a crucial election year. Things like this needs to be communicated to all state parties.
Posted by ga_dem on March 14, 2006 at 04:48 PM
The Democratic Party has refused to support Senator Fiengold's call for censure. The Democrats are a bunch of spineless wimps who cower in the face of the greatest threat to our form of government since Joe McCarthy. All you care about is getting re-elected and campaign donations. I am leaving the party because I am ashamed to call myself a Democrat.
Posted by wil123 on March 14, 2006 at 07:45 PM
The Republi-lites who don't support Feingold's call for censure need to be dealt with in the primaries. We need to find and support candidates who have a backbone, and the ethics to do the right thing, and not run for cover when the Republicans yell terrorist.
We need to support candidates who will stand up for the constitution of the United States.
We need candidates who whave ethics, integrity, and moral courage.
We need people who will stand up and work to correct this mess that five years of Republican corruption, cronyism, and incompetency has made of this country.
We need to vote the primaries and get these spineless sell-outs out of office so the Democrats will start to represent their true constituency, which is the American people.
Posted by Butte on March 14, 2006 at 10:19 PM
Brian111 -
Do your homework. Or, more correctly, get your nose out of Fox News. Frist called for an immediate vote on a censure as his own "stunt" to dispense with the matter, before advising the Democratic leadership of the vote.
Posted by BaronScarpia on March 15, 2006 at 06:14 AM
This is the first I've heard. It sounds great.
But, Dems are aching to know about unity with all the leaders in the party.
Posted by Sunnyhy on March 15, 2006 at 09:15 AM
From what I saw on CSPAN, Feingold left the floor, because Frist gave no indication of wanting to debate the issue until after Feingold left. There wasn't a call for an immediate vote. Frist was talking about putting the vote off. He gave the impression that he wanted a day to get any dissident Republicans in line.
Posted by Butte on March 15, 2006 at 10:30 AM
Where are our leaders when we need them? Sen. Feingold needs all of our Senators to stand with him. There are likely to be enough Repub. Senators cross-over so that we can censure Bush for the way he isn't running the war on terror. Come on Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Hillary, Chuck Schumer & Joe Biden - lets show some solidarity.
Posted by TomH1957 on March 15, 2006 at 01:22 PM
i think it is time for the dems. to get to gether and start fighting this rep. admin. i watch all the stuff they are doing and i think the dems. should start attaching the reps. i would never take this stuff as a school board director. i think it is time we all get a back bone and really go after them. they have done so much you don't know where to start. the time to start is now. i would like to see our dem. leader in the senate and the congress start attacking and not stop until nov. we seem to be unable to do this. i truly believe we are not. my uncle charly who use to be state chairman in north caroline. when the south was dem. is shuttering in his grave because we are not fighting the good fight. on west wing in a debate the dems. were accused starting to much spending and the dems. pointed out the manythings the dems. have done. sound the call expose all the lies and an admin. unable to do much right. keep hiting them harder and harder. give the americans a better alturnative and they will take it. don't give the reps. time to go back to the old refrain. hit them hard on all there mistakes and show a better alturnative.well that's my once of wisdom.
Posted by tillie on March 15, 2006 at 08:31 PM
Clearly, the Democratic action plan is to pander to the less intelligent.
Posted by johninvandergrift on March 16, 2006 at 10:05 AM
Typical Republican elitist reaction. Cut back school funding and disrespect people for not being better educated.
Tillie is sure as hell smart enough to figure out what the Democrats need to do better than the DNC has. And as school board director, she probably was fighting so the kids would get a better education. I'll bet that like a lot of us, she's got a PHD in the school of hard knocks.
Posted by Butte on March 16, 2006 at 10:58 AM
Typical Democratic response. Lash out without thinking. I am hardly a Republican Elitist. I grew up in a dying steel town where you were a democrat or nothing at all. I am a democrat that got tired of being talked down to by my party. I am a democrat that got tired of listening to those in my party spew unintellegent comment after comment. I am a democrat that realized the democratic party doesn't stand for the things it used to. I am a democrat no longer. And, for the record...intellegence does NOT go hand in hand with education. I never implied that. You did.
Posted by johninvandergrift on March 16, 2006 at 12:02 PM
Can anyone figure the Republicans Plans or Strategy?
I have been watching C-Span on the House of R.! The Democrats still can't get even one Amendment passed?
The Republicans don't defend their actions at all. The Republicans are in the majority so the amendment will not pass unless a few Republicans vote for it. The Republicans seem to say, "I don't care if the people don't like this Bill, we Republicans are in charge so what we say goes."
When one Democrat said, "only 34% of the people stand with you?" The Republican Majority ignored them?
Posted by freeforall on March 16, 2006 at 12:37 PM
How many writing in here have a degree in Political Science?
Some are real critical of our politicians that have a Degree in Political Science.
That is like a Construction worker advising one who has a Degree in architecture?
Posted by freeforall on March 16, 2006 at 01:18 PM
What the heck does a political science degree have to do with knowing anything? Especially about politics?
Political science majors wind up as either staffers or worse, as lobbyists. The majority of our legislators are lawyers, by the way, which probably explains a lot.
If a construction worker sees that the architect screwed up, he's going to say something, because while the construction worker may not have a fancy piece of paper, but experience-wise, if he's been in his trade for very long and is good at it, he has the equivalent of a PHD in experience with the matierals that he is working with and will know more about his area of expertise than the architect, to whom it's just a bunch of theories he studied in college to get his fancy certificate.
If some political bone head does something that affects me in a negative way, and I don't like it it is my patriotic duty to stand up and tell said bonehead he/she screwed up. If the bonehead is a corrupt bonehead, then it it is my patriotic duty to get the SOB fired, as in impeached, or voted out of office in the next election.
Posted by Butte on March 16, 2006 at 09:37 PM
You can forget the 50 State strategy. Feingold calls for censure of Bush and NOT A SINGLE Dem motioned for the vote to be held. If you will not support each other why should we support you!
I know that censure and impeachment would fail. Impeachment requires a House majority vote to begin investigative procedures and the Repubs have already announced they will not investigate the illegal wiretaps. The Repub party is officially operating as an illegal party. When the Dems sit passively by they assist the Repubs by acts of omission. Yes impeachment will fail but it will show the citizenry that the Repubs act collectively in an unconstitutional manner. (I believe anti-constitutional; i.e., hostile towards the Constitution itself rather than outlawed by it.) This would give the Dems another legitimate campaigning point. CALL FOR IMPEACHMENT OR YOU WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED AT THE PRESIDENTIAL LEVEL AS WELL AS THE FEDERAL CONGRESSIONAL LEVEL!
I once thought these threats were shooting myself in the foot. If the Dems sit by passively then my vote for you is pointless anyway. I would rather vote third party and save my principles than let the Dems flush them down the toilet through inaction. The Dems must prove now that they will fight and not cower. Do you want us to put blind faith in you, "Trust us, when we regain the majority we will be aggressive. Right now we are biding our time." That is the message you are currently sending. Look at the Repubs under Clinton; they were always very hostile and aggressive. They began impeachment proceedings against Clinton on Day 1 of his tenure (Whitewater). Bush publicly admits to violating the 4th Amendment and NO ONE will even support a pathetic censure vote.
Posted by Krampus on March 17, 2006 at 07:40 AM
Krampus
I've been reading your posts. Your writings reflect a sincere passion. If you would, please take a shot at convincing a one time democrat turned republican to return to the democratic party. Please don't parrot John Kerry and tell me about the "Party of Change". Give me substance. No attacks, just substance. How would the average guy like myself benefit from a party shift? How would our country be better? Thank you.
Posted by johninvandergrift on March 17, 2006 at 10:49 AM
Thank goodness for Howard Dean; he was wise enough to realize that the Democratic Party could not continue to run an 18-state regional party. The Democratic Party needs to run a 50-state party.
Also, I think that whoever the candidate is in 2008, he or she could try to visit the 5 most conservative states in the south (Alabama, Mississippi, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Tenneesse) and the 5 most conservative states in the mid-west (Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Colorado).
Personally, my top 2 candidates are Mark Warner of Virginia and Wesley Clark of Arkansas, because I do not agree with the idea of running a candidate that has already been the nominee during an earlier election cycle such as Al Gore or John Kerry, and I do not agree with running a candidate that is from the northeast or the west coast. We have to be serious about winning this time, and to do that, we are going to need some states from the south and midwest. Also, I do not agree with running a woman. There are still too many mysoginists out there, so Hillary Clinton would not be a good candidate.
Posted by LavoniaM on March 17, 2006 at 01:55 PM
I have been taking a few lessons from the elete
Butte and Brian and now I know what to say and how to say it! Thanks,BOYS, you have done a great deal for the Democrats and our Nation.
Keep up the good work and watch your friends take
the majority again.
Posted by freeforall on March 17, 2006 at 02:20 PM
We have an oportunity here to do two things this season.
First, we must kick these D.I.N.O. worms out of our senate and House races (I refer to the libermans, the hillarys, and the Zell millers of the Democratic party), and make sure that REAL progressive democrats run instead of these idiots.
Secondly, we must make sure that REAL democrats with some spine (YES conservatives, THEY EXIST!). I refer of course to Russ Feingold, Kennedy, Patrick Lahey (SP?) and other democrats that have been fighting the good fight since the begining of the dark days of the bush cabal, Instead of rolling over like the DINOs. While outting the worms is important, we must not forget to praise and honor the men who really ARE fighting for us. we MUST make sure they get relected at all costs.
Posted by Royal_Assassin on March 17, 2006 at 02:45 PM
Free, I'm not nor have I ever been a boy. You are going to have to get used to an opinionated FEMALE Army veteran.
No, I did not get on line yesterday. There are somethings more important than politics, like St Patrick's Day in Butte. Especially since the weather stayed above freezing and it was on a Friday this year.
The only thing I did political was when Republicans, Sen Burns and Rep Rehburg, rode by in a pickup truck, courtesy of a car dealership, I held up my finger to show them that they were #1 on my list. (I'll let you all guess which finger and which list.)
Posted by Butte on March 18, 2006 at 08:08 PM
Being part of the 90% with the 10%, I never have figured myself as an elitist. If anything I am an anti-elitist.
I, long ago, saw that the everyday American worker has more common sense, and native intelligence that a lot of these elitist boneheads.
The Democrat party needs to get back to sticking up for the average person, which includes fighting the "Joe Six-pack" image that Bushivision media has dissing the average working person with.
We need to fire the spoiled rich kid and his cronies, and get someone with drive, common sense and integrity back into office.
Firing the elitist snobs in both parties will be a good start in this legislative election year. Notice I did not say off-year election. Legislative elections are too important to be called "off" as in lay-off or goof-off, especially right now.
We need to get everybody included in this campaign for legislative seats, clean House, and Senate, and impeach Bush. That will be a good start. Then get a give-a-crap give-'em-hell-Harry Democrat candidate for 2008.
Posted by Butte on March 19, 2006 at 10:10 AM
Leading elected Demos won't get credibility until they stand up and start speaking out intelligently. Playing the racism card may work for the Republicans, but equating Arab capitalist businessmen from Dubai with Al Queda is repulsive to those of us who care about integrity. Anti-Arab grandstanding won't get any Demos elected in Nov. that I want to see in office. I suspect that most non-Repubs find hate-based decision-making unacceptable.
What we need are leaders sober enough to point out that Iran won't have nuclear weapons-making capability for at least 5 years. We are NOT in an emergency situation in spite of the spin from the White House. And then they need to put forth a workable plan for nuclear weapons reduction worldwide with the goal of verifiable eradication, including in the US, on a reasonable timeline. Action on such a plan during the next 5 years will give the US credibility on the nuclear issue, something we've never had since the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And will give us a powerful bargaining chip in preventing new entrants to the nuke club, including Iran.
Posted by voterDouglas on March 19, 2006 at 08:39 PM
Refusing to swallow Republican spin instead of looking at the facts isn't racist, it's called self-preservation.
Dubai sided with the Taliban, al-Quaida, and Bin Laden before 9/11. Why should we trust ANY country with that kind of track record.
I don't care if they're green with purple polka-dots, US companies should run US ports.
Bush has proved himself to be an outrageous liar, and any time he reassures Americans about an issue, you will find that the truth is nowhere near.
Posted by Butte on March 19, 2006 at 10:21 PM
Anerican workers should run US ports democratically through our unions, but I'm realistic enough to know it would take a whole lot more action than voting to bring that about.
Posted by voterDouglas on March 20, 2006 at 03:03 AM
Brian, Why don't you ask your hero the Shrub. He's the one whose been prating about how you can't trust Muslims, equating Muslims with terrorists, and targeting the Muslims in this country with extra surveilance since 9/11.
Then he turns around and kisses up to a government who has supported our enemies, and never said they were sorry!!!
And this doesn't strike you as being just a bit fishy? I strongly suggest you go to the nearest emergency room and have a cranial extraction done.
Posted by Butte on March 20, 2006 at 10:44 AM
Dear johninvandergraft:
Here is my reply to your request. I think you will be surprised by my responses. I do no think it is exactly what you were wanting; however, I honored your negative critieria (not parroting Kherry, etc.).
Posted by Krampus on March 20, 2006 at 07:23 PM
Krampus,
I'm sorry that you coudn't make a case for the democratic party. You told me why I should vote for you. What does the democratic party stand for? As far as what you stand for, I think I have a good idea now. A nationalized education. A national healthcare program. Why don't we just go all the way and promote socialism. You mentioned (incorrectly) that 300,000 auto workers are losing their jobs. Do me a favor. Educate yourself on the UAW job bank. Auto makers have been forced to reduce fix hourly labor costs because of the democratic/union job bank not Clay Fords Bonus'. Marketwatch.com ran an article today about this very matter.
From the article...the cost for idle hourly labor to rise to $4.7 billion at GM and $2.3 billion at Ford over the next two years.
"GM's JOBS Bank and Ford's GEN Pool provide full wages and benefits for workers displaced due to plant closings and capacity reductions, a significant impediment to both OEM's structural cost savings plans,"
Let me guess, you think having a job is an intrinsic right too, right? Please keep trying to change the minds of republicans, you are helping us more than you know.
Posted by johninvandergrift on March 21, 2006 at 03:32 PM
johninvandergrift:
Your initial responses are correct. I did not say why you should return to the Dem party.
Your second response about socialism is a slippery slope fallacy and I stated that I doubted nationalized healthcare would work in the U.S.
Regarding the Ford statistics, those came from news articles I read immediately after the announcement. Jobs are not an intrinsic right but are a necessary means in a capitalistic society to pursue happiness, an inalienable right. The implication of your criticism seems to ignore (or not realize) this logical relationship. If your implication is an overt stance of the Republican party then that is one major reason to leave it. The Dem party is superior to the Repubs in one important way: they understand issues and affects from positions other than their own. The Repus understand and act from their own interests only. Bush exemplifies this in every issue. I demonstrated this thoroughly in my response.
In my experience, lay Republicans are carelessly of the plight of others. Their positions seem to be summarizable as thus:
1. I support what benefits me and not what does not benefit me.
2. Issue/policy X benefits me.
3. Therefore, I support X.
4. Issue/policy Z does not benefit me.
5. Therefore, I do not support Z.
The purpose of government is not to promote the interests of specific groups but to promote the general welfare. Dems understand this whereas the Repubs are callous to the plight of the middle and lower classes. Haliburton, Enron, Bush's appointment/promotional practices are distinct contemporary examples. (Yes, Dems engage in nepotism too, just not with as brazenly unqualified individuals.)
Posted by Krampus on March 21, 2006 at 07:07 PM
SELF-CORRECTION (Typo only)
"300,000 jobs lost" should be "30,000 jobs lost".
Posted by Krampus on March 22, 2006 at 06:27 PM
« Hide Comments
Comments are now closed for this entry.